tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2344605508503053589.post2242714632285009871..comments2024-02-18T15:33:13.620+00:00Comments on Ralph and Sue's Meccano News: London Toy Fair 2016 and...Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2344605508503053589.post-9941767038802777022016-02-15T21:45:23.645+00:002016-02-15T21:45:23.645+00:00You are right, one 15mm rubber ring in the 1924/29...You are right, one 15mm rubber ring in the 1924/29 hand book, but two 15mm rubber ring in the 1930/35 hand book.Jean Claude Brissonnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2344605508503053589.post-41610583290883064442016-02-15T11:54:34.231+00:002016-02-15T11:54:34.231+00:00The rubber ring to fit the ½ inch pulley was avail...The rubber ring to fit the ½ inch pulley was available between 1927 and 1937 when it became obsolete, It used the same part number (155) that was also used for the 1 inch ring causing the confusion. Only one was included in the No.7 set, the largest set of the day that was rather larger than the Iconic No.10 of later years.<br /><br />Ralph. Ralph Laughtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05400542638638661314noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2344605508503053589.post-60724370348419237122016-02-15T09:52:09.849+00:002016-02-15T09:52:09.849+00:00Sorry, but before the world war II, the rubber rin...Sorry, but before the world war II, the rubber ring (black or white) was for the one inch pulley. The 1/2 inch pulley was not so common at that time.Brissonnoreply@blogger.com